Home | Community | Get Involved | Donate | | Site Index | Search Go Button
The mark, American Cancer Society, is a registered trademark of the American Cancer Society, Inc., and may not be copied, reproduced, transmitted, displayed, performed, distributed, sublicensed, altered, stored for subsequent use or otherwise used in whole or in part in any manner without ACS's prior written consent.
 
My Planner Register | Sign In Sign In


ACS News Center
 
    Medical Updates
    News You Can Use
    Stories of Hope
    ACS Archives
    ACS News Center Staff
   
   
   
    I Want to Help
  You can help in the fight against cancer. Donate and volunteer. It's easy and fun!
  Learn more
   
BRCA1/2 Mutations Linked to Poorer Outcome for Breast Cancer Patients
BRCA1/2 Mutations Linked to Poorer Outcome for Breast Cancer Patients
Article date: 2001/05/23
Among patients with familial breast cancer, those with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations have a worse outcome than those who do not, according to two papers published in the Dec. 15 issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The studies collectively indicate that BRCA1 tumors tend to be larger, more aggressive, and have low levels of a protein called p27kip1 – all of which predict an overall poorer outcome for the patient.

In the first study, researchers tested 183 women with familial breast cancer for errors in the BRCA1 gene, which are associated with an increased risk for breast cancer. Forty patients, (22%) from 36 different families, had a detectable mutation. Tumors from BRCA1 carriers and non-carriers were then compared for several characteristics, including size and grade.

BRCA1 tumors were more advanced at the time of detection, and were larger in diameter. The proportion of tumors that had spread to the lymph nodes was 40% for BRCA1 carriers, versus 21% for the non-BRCA1 tumors. The tumors were also more often estrogen receptor-negative (ER-negative) and progesterone receptor-negative (PR-negative), meaning they can grow in the absence of these hormones and aren''t prevented by tamoxifen. Unfortunately, BRCA1 mutations were also associated with a poorer five-year survival rate for the patient (80% vs. 90%).

Protein Levels Predict Prognosis

In a second study, Canadian researchers found that BRCA1/2 tumors tend to have low levels of a protein called p27kip1, which is also associated with a poor outcome. They screened 202 Ashkenazi Jewish women with primary invasive breast cancer for the three BRCA1/2 mutations common to that population. Of these 202 samples, 32 were identified as BRCA1/2 carriers (16%).

The tumors from 27 of these BRCA1/2 carriers were then tested for levels of p27kip1 protein. Eighty-five percent of BRCA1/2 tumors had low levels of the p27kip1 protein, compared to 59% of the BRCA negative tumors. Low levels of this protein were associated with larger, higher-grade tumors that were likely to be ER-negative.

Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations or low p27kip1 protein levels also had poorer outcomes. Five years after diagnosis and treatment, 58% of BRCA1/2 carriers were alive and cancer-free, compared to 82% of the non-carriers. The outcome for patients with low levels of p27kip1 protein was similar – 68% of patients with low levels of the protein were alive and disease-free after five years, compared to 93% for those with high levels of the protein.

Heather Feigelson, PhD, an Epidemiologist at the American Cancer Society (ACS), says this study should be expanded to include larger numbers of patients. "The fact that both studies reached the same conclusion about reduced survival among women with breast cancer who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation adds credibility to the findings, but these results really need to be confirmed in a larger study," says Feigelson.

Screening and Prevention

Fortunately, BRCA1/2 mutations are very rare, accounting for only about 5% of all breast cancers. But outcome studies like this may prove beneficial to women who are BRCA1/2 carriers, since they may want more aggressive prevention and/or treatment options.

All women should do monthly self-breast exams. The ACS recommends that beginning at age 40, women should have regular screening, including mammograms, by a health care provider. "Women who think that they are at high risk should talk with their doctor about earlier and more frequent screening or other options like ultrasound or tamoxifen," says Feigelson. According to Herman Kattlove, MD, an Oncologist and Medical Editor for the ACS, "Tamoxifen might be a good choice. A recent study published in the December 2 issue of The Lancet reported that tamoxifen cut the rate of breast cancer in BRCA-positive women by 50%." He added "Some women just want to eliminate as much risk as possible and prefer to have prophylactic mastectomy."


ACS News Center stories are provided as a source of cancer-related news and are not intended to be used as press releases.
Printer-Friendly Page
Email this Page
Related Tools & Topics
Bookstore  
Learn About Cancer  
Prevention & Early Detection  
Not registered yet?
  Register now or see reasons to register.  
Help |  About ACS |  Employment & Volunteer Opportunities |  Legal & Privacy Information |  Press Room
Copyright 2009 © American Cancer Society, Inc.
All content and works posted on this website are owned and
copyrighted by the American Cancer Society, Inc. All rights reserved.